UK parliamentarians urge impartiality and transparency from Pearson in its school text books on Israel-Palestine

A group of cross-party parliamentarians in the UK, have written to publisher Pearson about its school text books used by GCSE students on Israel-Palestine, urging them to be impartial, academic and transparent in the significant revisions made to the text books. 

The letter, signed by Caabu Chair Rt Hon David Jones MP, former Education Minister Rt Hon Tessa Blackstone, Caabu board member Rt Hon Alistair Carmichael MP, Lord Bishop of Southwark Rt Rev Christopher Chessun, Caabu patron Rt Hon Lord Peter Hain, Education Select Committee member Kim Johnson MP,  SNP Education Spoksperson Carol Monaghan MP and Vice Chair of the Britain-Palestine All Party Parliamentary Group, Andy Slaughter MP, highlights a report from two academics, John Chalcraft and James Dickins. More about their report can be found in the Independent and the Guardian. In the letter, the parliamentarians write: 

"These revisions were made following interventions from the Board of Deputies and UK Lawyers for Israel.  As the two academics point out, 294 alterations were consequently made in one of the texts, and more than 300 in the other. The report analyses this.  It finds that the vast majority of these changes are in one direction, favouring an Israeli government narrative whilst downplaying the Palestinian experience. For example, the revised version questions whether annexing occupied territory is illegal or not. The international legal position on this, and indeed the long-term position of the British government and the International Court of Justice, is that any such annexation is illegal. This is why Britain determined the Russian annexation of Crimea was illegal."

The letter concludes:

"We would also urge you to adopt a more impartial and academic approach to reviewing your materials.  The involvement of two partial lobbying groups in this process behind the scenes raises significant and obvious concerns about possible undue influence.  That is why we share the concern of the academics that this debate should be open, transparent and in the public domain."

The letter in full reads as follows:

Dear Mr Bristow and Ms Hague

We write to you as a group of cross-party politicians concerned with education and the Middle East.

In March 2021, two academics, John Chalcraft and James Dickins, sent you a report examining the significant revisions made to two of your textbooks, written by Hilary Brash. These were Conflict in the Middle East, c1945-1995, Edexcel GCSE (9-1) History, Series Editor: Angela Leonard (London: Pearson, 2016) and The Middle East: Conflict, Crisis and Change, 1917-2012, Edexcel International GCSE (9-1) History, Series Editor: Nigel Kelly (London: Pearson, 2017).

These revisions were made following interventions from the Board of Deputies and UK Lawyers for Israel.  As the two academics point out, 294 alterations were consequently made in one of the texts, and more than 300 in the other. The report analyses this.  It finds that the vast majority of these changes are in one direction, favouring an Israeli government narrative whilst downplaying the Palestinian experience. For example, the revised version questions whether annexing occupied territory is illegal or not. The international legal position on this, and indeed the long-term position of the British government and the International Court of Justice, is that any such annexation is illegal. This is why Britain determined the Russian annexation of Crimea was illegal.

Considering that these textbooks are used at schools in this country, we believe that there is a significant public interest as to their content.  We would welcome a proper public response to the report from the academics outlining how these changes came about and why they were adopted.

We would also urge you to adopt a more impartial and academic approach to reviewing your materials.  The involvement of two partial lobbying groups in this process behind the scenes raises significant and obvious concerns about possible undue influence.  That is why we share the concern of the academics that this debate should be open, transparent and in the public domain.

We look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

Rt Hon David Jones MP, Chair – Council for Arab-British Understanding (Caabu)

Rt Hon Baroness Tessa Blackstone, former Minister for Education

Rt Hon Alistair Carmichael MP

Rt Revd Christopher Chessun, Lord Bishop of Southwark

Rt Hon Lord Peter Hain

Kim Johnson MP, Education select committee

Carol Monaghan MP, SNP education spokesperson

Andy Slaughter MP, Vice Chair Britain-Palestine, All Party Parliamentary Group

Pearson Caabu

Pearson Caabu

Pearson responded to the letter on 16 July 2021. 

Pearson response David Jones Palestine

Pearson response David Jones Palestine